Written by Morgane Urbain, co-founder and creative director of Bonhomme.

Most briefs a design studio receives confuse the two terms. Clients ask for "branding" when they are thinking of a logo. This confusion leads to visual identities being delivered without a strategic foundation.

Understanding the difference between branding and visual identity means understanding the difference between a structure and a facade. The facade can be beautiful. Without a structure, it does not stand.

Nike is the clearest example of comprehensive branding. The swoosh is recognizable, but it is the conviction it embodies, "Just Do It," that runs through every product and every piece of communication.
Patagonia does not have the most sophisticated visual identity. But its branding is among the most powerful: a radical environmental conviction, and consistency between stated values and real actions.
Muji: a visual identity pared down to the minimum, branding of absolute clarity. Absence is the message.

The Brand Architecture Framework is the method Bonhomme developed to sequence the building of a brand in four interdependent levels. Each level must be defined before moving on to the next.

The Bonhomme rule: Bonhomme always runs a platform phase before any design work, even when the client thinks they only need a visual identity. From its offices in Paris, the Bonhomme branding agency has followed this sequence since 2013.

Across more than 125 projects, Bonhomme consistently observes that:
Brands that commission a visual identity without a platform first come back for a redesign twice as soon, on average.
Brands with a solid platform make their creative decisions faster and with fewer rounds of feedback.
The lack of a verbal territory is the second most common problem, after the lack of a platform.

Money Walkie: Bonhomme started by clarifying the brand platform, then rolled out a complete design system unifying the identity, website and mobile app. Clémence C.: "Precise, aesthetic and human."
L'Oréal Next: "They went beyond our expectations, getting us to reflect on the core values of our project to better express our why-how-what."

- Commissioning a visual identity when what you need is branding. A new logo will not solve anything if the positioning is unclear.
- Delivering a visual identity without a brand platform. Without a founding document, every decision starts from scratch.
- Treating the verbal side as secondary. Verbal branding is just as important as visual branding.
- Seeing branding as a project rather than an ongoing state.
- Confusing speed with depth: jumping straight to the visual identity to "save time" means building without foundations.

"Visual identity is what you see of a brand. Branding is what you feel. Confusing the two means mistaking the facade for the structure, and building houses that do not stand."

Morgane Urbain, co-founder & creative director

"The logo is the last decision in a good branding project. Everything else (the values, the vision, the promise, the territory) must be resolved before a single line is drawn."

Emmanuel Cruellas, co-founder & design director

Branding and visual identity are part of an ecosystem of concepts and methods specific to Bonhomme. Understanding how they connect places the branding / visual identity distinction within a broader view of brand building.